PSFF vs. TRFK
PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. PSFF is actively managed, while TRFK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSFF returned 12.40%/yr vs 42.90%/yr for TRFK. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.
Performance
PSFF vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 42.16% return.
PSFF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
TRFK
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- 6M
- 39.68%
- YTD
- 42.16%
- 1Y
- 50.62%
- 3Y*
- 42.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 37.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.37M | $1.73M | $1.90M | |
| $17.22M | $18.25M | $19.56M |
PSFF vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 7.27% | 10.38% | 13.18% | 18.39% | 1.65% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 42.16% | 26.81% | 38.30% | 66.63% | -10.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFF and TRFK is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PSFF and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFF vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank
PSFF
TRFK
PSFF vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSFF | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.24 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 1.94 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.76 | 5.23 | +12.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSFF vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and TRFK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFF | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -29.06% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -26.17% | +22.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.78% | -29.06% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.08% | +18.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -6.25% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 9.70% | -8.95% |
Volatility
PSFF vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 1.72%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFF | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 16.62% | -14.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.86% | 32.05% | -27.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 36.82% | -30.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 30.90% | -21.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 30.90% | -21.87% |
PSFF vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFF vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison
PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFF and TRFK have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRFK has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to PSFF (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFF dropped -10.78% vs TRFK's -29.06%.
On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 42.90% vs 12.40% for PSFF. On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 42.90% return vs 12.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.
TRFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.
PSFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TRFK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.60% for TRFK.
PSFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFF and TRFK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer