PSFF vs. SRVR
PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. PSFF is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSFF returned 9.43%/yr vs -0.81%/yr for SRVR. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
PSFF vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.
PSFF
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PSFF vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 5.72% | 10.38% | 13.18% | 18.39% | -4.11% | 11.81% | 0.37% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFF and SRVR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between PSFF and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSFF vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSFF
SRVR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSFF
SRVR
Financial Services
PSFF
SRVR
Communication Services
PSFF
SRVR
Consumer Cyclical
PSFF
SRVR
-
Healthcare
PSFF
SRVR
-
Industrials
PSFF
SRVR
Consumer Defensive
PSFF
SRVR
-
Energy
PSFF
SRVR
Utilities
PSFF
SRVR
Real Estate
PSFF
SRVR
Basic Materials
PSFF
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFF vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PSFF
SRVR
PSFF vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFF | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.13 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 0.76 | +3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.44 | 1.64 | +18.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFF | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 0.67 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | -0.04 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.30 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
PSFF vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFF | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -40.99% | +30.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -14.78% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.78% | -18.34% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.78% | -40.99% | +30.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -12.28% | +12.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -15.27% | +13.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 6.83% | -6.10% |
Volatility
PSFF vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 1.02%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFF | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 5.47% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.54% | 13.12% | -8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 16.72% | -10.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 19.71% | -10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 21.44% | -12.34% |
PSFF vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFF vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFF and SRVR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFF dropped -10.78% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, PSFF leads with 9.43% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSFF has performed better with a 9.43% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.
PSFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.60% for SRVR.
PSFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFF and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer