SRVR vs. FCFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX).
SRVR is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. It was launched on May 15, 2018. FCFAX is managed by Frost Funds. It was launched on Dec 3, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SRVR or FCFAX.
Key characteristics
SRVR | FCFAX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 7.07% | 7.93% |
1Y Return | 22.01% | 12.97% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -6.16% | 3.45% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 3.01% | 4.62% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.31 | 4.95 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.89 | 8.41 |
Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 2.17 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.59 | 6.25 |
Martin Ratio | 4.13 | 43.14 |
Ulcer Index | 5.16% | 0.29% |
Daily Std Dev | 16.27% | 2.57% |
Max Drawdown | -40.99% | -16.33% |
Current Drawdown | -22.11% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and FCFAX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than FCFAX's 7.93% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than FCFAX's 5.79% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 1.81% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frost Credit Fund | 5.79% | 5.95% | 4.99% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 4.63% | 4.68% | 4.60% | 4.85% | 4.96% | 4.56% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and FCFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 0.78%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.