SRVR vs. FCFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX).
SRVR is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. It was launched on May 15, 2018. FCFAX is managed by Frost Funds. It was launched on Dec 3, 2012.
Performance
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 9.80% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.51% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | -0.70% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 6.22% | 6.95% | 0.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than FCFAX's -0.70% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FCFAX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
FCFAX
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRVR | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 1.21 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 1.69 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.41 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 5.32 | -3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRVR | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 1.21 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 1.36 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.41 | -1.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and FCFAX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than FCFAX's 5.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.95% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 5.61% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and FCFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -16.33% | -24.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -2.34% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -10.49% | -30.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.60% | -2.03% | -17.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -1.54% | -13.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.86% | 0.62% | +6.24% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 1.02%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 1.02% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 1.55% | +10.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 2.63% | +15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 2.73% | +16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 3.24% | +18.24% |