PortfoliosLab logo
SRVR vs. FCFAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SRVR and FCFAX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

SRVR vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
46.85%
33.85%
SRVR
FCFAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SRVR:

0.80

FCFAX:

3.38

Sortino Ratio

SRVR:

1.16

FCFAX:

5.42

Omega Ratio

SRVR:

1.16

FCFAX:

1.72

Calmar Ratio

SRVR:

0.36

FCFAX:

6.24

Martin Ratio

SRVR:

2.18

FCFAX:

19.80

Ulcer Index

SRVR:

6.04%

FCFAX:

0.42%

Daily Std Dev

SRVR:

16.46%

FCFAX:

2.46%

Max Drawdown

SRVR:

-40.99%

FCFAX:

-16.33%

Current Drawdown

SRVR:

-21.74%

FCFAX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly higher than FCFAX's 1.30% return.


SRVR

YTD

4.74%

1M

3.34%

6M

3.75%

1Y

11.18%

5Y*

-0.75%

10Y*

N/A

FCFAX

YTD

1.30%

1M

0.98%

6M

2.30%

1Y

8.20%

5Y*

4.27%

10Y*

4.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SRVR vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FCFAX: current value at 0.96% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.96%
Expense ratio chart for SRVR: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SRVR vs. FCFAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRVR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SRVR is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SRVR is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SRVR is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SRVR is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SRVR is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SRVR is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FCFAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCFAX is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SRVR vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for SRVR, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.803.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for SRVR, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.165.42
The chart of Omega ratio for SRVR, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.161.72
The chart of Calmar ratio for SRVR, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.366.24
The chart of Martin ratio for SRVR, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.1819.80
SRVR
FCFAX

The current SRVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the FCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRVR and FCFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.80
3.38
SRVR
FCFAX

Dividends

SRVR vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison

SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than FCFAX's 5.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
1.91%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.58%1.61%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
5.81%5.79%5.95%4.99%3.64%3.70%4.63%4.68%4.60%4.85%4.96%4.56%

Drawdowns

SRVR vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and FCFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-21.74%
0
SRVR
FCFAX

Volatility

SRVR vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 0.71%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.23%
0.71%
SRVR
FCFAX