PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFF vs. PSMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFF vs. PSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than PSMR's 7.68% return.


PSFF

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.85%
YTD
5.72%
6M
6.41%
1Y
14.89%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

PSMR

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.54%
YTD
7.68%
6M
8.38%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFF vs. PSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
5.72%10.38%13.18%18.39%-4.11%7.05%
PSMR
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
7.68%6.74%11.99%16.85%-4.11%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFF and PSMR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.82

The correlation between PSFF and PSMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSFF vs. PSMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSFF
PSMR

Technology

36.2%
33.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.8%

Industrials

8.1%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.4%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

PSFF
36.2%
PSMR
33.1%

Financial Services

PSFF
11.9%
PSMR
12.3%

Communication Services

PSFF
10.9%
PSMR
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PSFF
10.1%
PSMR
10.1%

Healthcare

PSFF
8.4%
PSMR
9.8%

Industrials

PSFF
8.1%
PSMR
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSFF
4.9%
PSMR
5.4%

Energy

PSFF
3.5%
PSMR
3.5%

Utilities

PSFF
2.3%
PSMR
2.5%

Real Estate

PSFF
1.9%
PSMR
2.0%

Basic Materials

PSFF
1.8%
PSMR
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFF vs. PSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFF
PSFF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PSFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PSMR
PSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFF vs. PSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFFPSMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.96

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

15.03

-10.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.44

73.58

-53.15

PSFF vs. PSMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is lower than the PSMR Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFF and PSMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFFPSMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

4.23

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.01

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.05

+0.06

Drawdowns

PSFF vs. PSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum PSMR drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and PSMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFFPSMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-11.78%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.67%

-0.99%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.78%

-11.78%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.78%

-11.78%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.15%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-1.67%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.20%

+0.53%

Volatility

PSFF vs. PSMR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) at 0.71%. This indicates that PSFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFFPSMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.71%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

2.48%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

3.53%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.22%

8.48%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.10%

8.41%

+0.69%

PSFF vs. PSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PSMR's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSFF vs. PSMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSFF nor PSMR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PSFF and PSMR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSFF has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFF dropped -10.78% vs PSMR's -11.78%.

On 5-year performance, PSFF leads with 9.43% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSFF has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.

PSFF and PSMR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.61% for PSMR.

PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFF and PSMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer