PSFF vs. PSMR
PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) and PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Pacer. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSFF returned 9.43%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for PSMR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSFF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PSMR.
Performance
PSFF vs. PSMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than PSMR's 7.68% return.
PSFF
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PSMR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PSFF vs. PSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF | 5.72% | 10.38% | 13.18% | 18.39% | -4.11% | 7.05% |
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.68% | 6.74% | 11.99% | 16.85% | -4.11% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFF and PSMR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PSFF and PSMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSFF vs. PSMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSFF
PSMR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSFF
PSMR
Financial Services
PSFF
PSMR
Communication Services
PSFF
PSMR
Consumer Cyclical
PSFF
PSMR
Healthcare
PSFF
PSMR
Industrials
PSFF
PSMR
Consumer Defensive
PSFF
PSMR
Energy
PSFF
PSMR
Utilities
PSFF
PSMR
Real Estate
PSFF
PSMR
Basic Materials
PSFF
PSMR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFF vs. PSMR — Risk / Return Rank
PSFF
PSMR
PSFF vs. PSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFF | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.96 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 15.03 | -10.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.44 | 73.58 | -53.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFF | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 4.23 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.01 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 1.05 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
PSFF vs. PSMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum PSMR drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and PSMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFF | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -11.78% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -0.99% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.78% | -11.78% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.78% | -11.78% | +1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.15% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -1.67% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.20% | +0.53% |
Volatility
PSFF vs. PSMR - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) at 0.71%. This indicates that PSFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFF | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.71% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.54% | 2.48% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 3.53% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 8.48% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.10% | 8.41% | +0.69% |
PSFF vs. PSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PSMR's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFF vs. PSMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSFF nor PSMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFF and PSMR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSFF has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFF dropped -10.78% vs PSMR's -11.78%.
On 5-year performance, PSFF leads with 9.43% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSFF has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.
PSFF and PSMR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFF and 0.61% for PSMR.
PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFF and PSMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer