PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFF vs. COWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSFF vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSFF vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
-0.53%10.38%13.18%18.39%0.41%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-3.92%10.24%34.99%20.69%-0.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFF achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -3.92% return.


PSFF

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
1.48%
1Y
12.17%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*

COWG

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
-7.05%
1Y
9.21%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSFF vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSFF vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFF
PSFF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PSFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

COWG
COWG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFF vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFFCOWGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

0.41

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

0.74

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.10

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.79

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.28

2.55

+7.73

PSFF vs. COWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the COWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFF and COWG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFFCOWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.41

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.93

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between PSFF and COWG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PSFF vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


TTM2025202420232022
PSFF
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.35%0.32%0.40%0.47%0.00%

Drawdowns

PSFF vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFF drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, smaller than the maximum COWG drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFF and COWG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFFCOWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-23.60%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-12.96%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-7.98%

+6.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-3.36%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

4.00%

-2.77%

Volatility

PSFF vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) is 2.82%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that PSFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSFFCOWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

5.87%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

13.24%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.70%

22.50%

-12.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.22%

19.32%

-10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

19.32%

-10.13%