PSET vs. VYM
PSET (Principal Quality ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSET is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Price Setters, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSET returned 12.82%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for VYM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSET charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
PSET vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 12.82%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.
PSET
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
PSET vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.31% | 7.27% | 17.65% | 24.07% | -16.52% | 29.59% | 16.20% | 34.85% | -2.29% | 24.63% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.42% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSET and VYM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PSET and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSET vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSET
VYM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSET
VYM
Industrials
PSET
VYM
Financial Services
PSET
VYM
Healthcare
PSET
VYM
Communication Services
PSET
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
PSET
VYM
Basic Materials
PSET
VYM
Energy
PSET
VYM
Consumer Defensive
PSET
VYM
Real Estate
PSET
-
VYM
Utilities
PSET
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSET vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
PSET
VYM
PSET vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSET | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.47 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 3.99 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 15.01 | -12.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSET | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 2.61 | -1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.83 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.73 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.51 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
PSET vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSET | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -56.98% | +22.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -6.69% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.96% | -14.46% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -15.84% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.74% | -35.21% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -0.48% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -7.19% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 1.78% | +2.04% |
Volatility
PSET vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.72%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSET | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.72% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 7.66% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 10.26% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 13.96% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 16.34% | +1.71% |
PSET vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSET vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.62% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSET and VYM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSET has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to VYM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, PSET leads with 12.82% vs 11.84% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSET has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PSET.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.62% for PSET.
PSET is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VYM is Dividend. PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSET and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer