PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has underperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 12.82%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.


PSET

1D
0.80%
1M
2.98%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.01%
1Y
8.25%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
12.82%

ILCB

1D
0.40%
1M
4.85%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.45%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSET vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.31%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-2.29%24.63%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.56%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PSET and ILCB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.72

The correlation between PSET and ILCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSET vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
ILCB

Technology

37.9%
35.5%

Industrials

19.1%
8.6%

Financial Services

14.3%
11.7%

Healthcare

10.8%
8.6%

Communication Services

6.7%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
10.1%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.8%

Energy

1.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

PSET
37.9%
ILCB
35.5%

Industrials

PSET
19.1%
ILCB
8.6%

Financial Services

PSET
14.3%
ILCB
11.7%

Healthcare

PSET
10.8%
ILCB
8.6%

Communication Services

PSET
6.7%
ILCB
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.4%
ILCB
10.1%

Basic Materials

PSET
3.3%
ILCB
1.8%

Energy

PSET
1.4%
ILCB
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
ILCB
4.8%

Real Estate

PSET

-

ILCB
1.8%

Utilities

PSET

-

ILCB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSET vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSETILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.43

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.14

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

14.46

-12.30

PSET vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSET Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSET and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSETILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.38

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.79

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.83

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.64

+0.08

Drawdowns

PSET vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-51.53%

+16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-9.09%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-19.05%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-25.47%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-35.30%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.27%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-6.23%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

1.97%

+1.85%

Volatility

PSET vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.83%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.83%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

9.11%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

12.01%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

17.12%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

18.16%

-0.11%

PSET vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSET vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than ILCB's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.96%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.62%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PSET and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSET has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to ILCB (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 10-year performance, ILCB leads with 14.98% vs 12.82% for PSET. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PSET.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.62% for PSET.

PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.03% for ILCB.

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer