PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCC vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 6.99%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


PSCC

1D
0.93%
1M
7.91%
YTD
12.79%
6M
9.16%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*
6.99%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
2.90%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
47.99%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCC vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
12.79%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCC and VGT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between PSCC and VGT has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSCC vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCC
VGT

Consumer Defensive

90.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.8%
0.0%

Industrials

3.0%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
0.1%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCC
90.4%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

PSCC
3.8%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

PSCC
3.0%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCC
2.9%
VGT
0.1%

Communication Services

PSCC

-

VGT
0.5%

Energy

PSCC

-

VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

PSCC

-

VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

PSCC

-

VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

PSCC

-

VGT

-

Technology

PSCC

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

PSCC

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCC vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCCVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.36

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

2.94

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

9.11

-8.61

PSCC vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCC and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCCVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-54.63%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-16.40%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-27.23%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-35.07%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-35.07%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.94%

-7.18%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-7.95%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

5.28%

+3.40%

Volatility

PSCC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 4.40%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCCVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

10.00%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

18.00%

-6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

22.00%

-5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

25.40%

-7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

24.72%

-5.42%

PSCC vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
1.97%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCC and VGT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to PSCC (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 6.99% for PSCC. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.

PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCC and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer