PSCC vs. FLAU

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while FLAU is a Australia Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCC returned 3.05%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for FLAU. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.

Performance

PSCC vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than FLAU's 9.73% return.

PSCC

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 4.39%
• 6M: 13.60%
• YTD: 18.26%
• 1Y: 6.05%
• 3Y*: 1.66%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: 6.77%
• ALL TIME*: 10.90%

FLAU

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: 7.22%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 11.36%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCC vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF	18.26%	-16.47%	0.98%	14.83%	-6.66%	28.82%	11.17%	17.39%	-6.72%	4.05%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	9.73%	15.95%	1.81%	12.58%	-5.58%	9.90%	11.00%	23.38%	-10.17%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCC and FLAU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between PSCC and FLAU has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSCC vs. FLAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCC	FLAU
Consumer Defensive	90.8%	4.0%
Basic Materials	4.3%	24.6%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	7.3%
Industrials	2.3%	5.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	38.3%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Energy	-	5.3%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Real Estate	-	5.7%
Technology	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

PSCC vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCC

PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 16
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 16
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FLAU

FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 28
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCC vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSCC	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	0.72	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	1.10	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.14	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	1.23	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	3.43	-2.74

PSCC vs. FLAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the FLAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCC and FLAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSCC vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and FLAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCC	FLAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.61%	-45.73%	+12.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-10.01%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-22.03%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.36%	-24.68%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.66%	-3.77%	-3.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-6.75%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.69%	3.57%	+5.12%

Volatility

PSCC vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) at 3.72%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCC	FLAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	3.72%	+2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	14.47%	-2.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.83%	16.98%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	19.62%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	23.50%	-4.14%

PSCC vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCC vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison

PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than FLAU's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	3.14%	3.25%	3.37%	3.62%	5.91%	5.14%	2.18%	4.37%	4.34%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF	1.66%	2.35%	1.88%	1.49%	1.29%	1.21%	1.59%	1.77%	0.94%	1.25%	1.48%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCC and FLAU in my portfolio?

PSCC and FLAU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCC or FLAU?

PSCC has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to FLAU (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs FLAU's -45.73%.

Which ETF is better, PSCC or FLAU?

On 5-year performance, FLAU leads with 6.80% vs 3.05% for PSCC. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAU has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCC or FLAU?

Over the 5-year period, FLAU has performed better with a 6.80% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCC or FLAU?

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCC or FLAU?

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 1.66% for PSCC.

What is the main difference between PSCC and FLAU?

PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FLAU is Australia Equities. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.09% for FLAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.