PRYMY vs. DAC
PRYMY (Prysmian SPA ADR) and DAC (Danaos Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PRYMY in Electrical Equipment & Parts, DAC in Marine Shipping. Over the past 10 years, PRYMY returned 24.47%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for DAC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRYMY vs. DAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRYMY achieves a 68.28% return, which is significantly higher than DAC's 34.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PRYMY has outperformed DAC with an annualized return of 24.47%, while DAC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.71% annualized return.
PRYMY
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- 68.28%
- 6M
- 66.27%
- 1Y
- 153.61%
- 3Y*
- 66.05%
- 5Y*
- 37.77%
- 10Y*
- 24.47%
DAC
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 34.08%
- 6M
- 33.38%
- 1Y
- 47.72%
- 3Y*
- 28.19%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
PRYMY vs. DAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRYMY Prysmian SPA ADR | 68.28% | 60.15% | 42.14% | 24.72% | 0.47% | 7.10% | 46.21% | 29.95% | -38.15% | 29.80% |
DAC Danaos Corporation | 34.08% | 22.24% | 12.41% | 47.51% | -26.57% | 256.10% | 133.44% | -12.57% | -48.28% | -45.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRYMY and DAC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010 | 0.14 |
The correlation between PRYMY and DAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRYMY:
$49.06B
DAC:
$2.27B
PRYMY:
€2.27
DAC:
$28.34
PRYMY:
32.47
DAC:
4.39
PRYMY:
2.21
DAC:
2.19
PRYMY:
6.25
DAC:
0.58
PRYMY:
€20.04B
DAC:
$1.04B
PRYMY:
€6.04B
DAC:
$705.76M
PRYMY:
€2.65B
DAC:
$739.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRYMY vs. DAC — Risk / Return Rank
PRYMY
DAC
PRYMY vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prysmian SPA ADR (PRYMY) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRYMY | DAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.37 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.10 | 3.81 | +6.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.06 | 11.96 | +16.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRYMY vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRYMY drawdown since its inception was -58.18%, smaller than the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRYMY and DAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRYMY | DAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.18% | -99.42% | +41.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.31% | -12.58% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.01% | -28.87% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.01% | -50.14% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.97% | -95.81% | +40.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.89% | -68.13% | +59.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -80.41% | +59.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 4.00% | +1.50% |
Volatility
PRYMY vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison
Prysmian SPA ADR (PRYMY) has a higher volatility of 17.40% compared to Danaos Corporation (DAC) at 5.54%. This indicates that PRYMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRYMY | DAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.40% | 5.54% | +11.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.68% | 16.60% | +17.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.17% | 21.13% | +19.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 34.19% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.07% | 64.99% | -28.92% |
Dividends
PRYMY vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison
PRYMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than DAC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAC Danaos Corporation | 2.85% | 3.66% | 4.06% | 4.12% | 5.70% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRYMY Prysmian SPA ADR | 0.62% | 0.88% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 0.49% | 2.57% | 5.65% | 2.45% | 3.61% |
Financials
PRYMY vs. DAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prysmian SPA ADR and Danaos Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRYMY vs. DAC - Profitability Comparison
PRYMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prysmian SPA ADR reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 5.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
DAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.
PRYMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prysmian SPA ADR reported an operating income of 333.00M and revenue of 5.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
DAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
PRYMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prysmian SPA ADR reported a net income of 246.00M and revenue of 5.22B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
DAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRYMY and DAC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRYMY has higher volatility (17.40%) compared to DAC (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRYMY dropped -58.18% vs DAC's -99.42%.
PRYMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRYMY and DAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer