PRYMY vs. ETN
PRYMY (Prysmian SPA ADR) and ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PRYMY in Electrical Equipment & Parts, ETN in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, PRYMY returned 25.26%/yr vs 24.08%/yr for ETN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRYMY vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRYMY achieves a 79.33% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's 33.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRYMY having a 25.26% annualized return and ETN not far behind at 24.08%.
PRYMY
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 20.91%
- YTD
- 79.33%
- 6M
- 86.07%
- 1Y
- 174.57%
- 3Y*
- 68.15%
- 5Y*
- 39.99%
- 10Y*
- 25.26%
ETN
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 33.02%
- 6M
- 26.26%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 25.16%
- 10Y*
- 24.08%
PRYMY vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRYMY Prysmian SPA ADR | 79.33% | 60.15% | 42.14% | 24.72% | 0.47% | 7.10% | 46.21% | 29.95% | -38.15% | 29.80% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 33.02% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRYMY and ETN is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, PRYMY and ETN have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PRYMY:
$52.28B
ETN:
$163.93B
PRYMY:
$2.27
ETN:
$10.22
PRYMY:
39.34
ETN:
41.19
PRYMY:
0.98
ETN:
2.24
PRYMY:
2.67
ETN:
5.76
PRYMY:
7.57
ETN:
8.29
PRYMY:
$20.04B
ETN:
$28.52B
PRYMY:
$6.04B
ETN:
$7.87B
PRYMY:
$2.65B
ETN:
$4.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRYMY vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
PRYMY
ETN
PRYMY vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prysmian SPA ADR (PRYMY) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRYMY | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.18 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.48 | 1.61 | +9.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.60 | 3.53 | +31.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRYMY | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66 | 0.97 | +3.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.85 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PRYMY vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRYMY drawdown since its inception was -58.18%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRYMY and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRYMY | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.18% | -68.95% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.31% | -19.14% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.01% | -34.46% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.01% | -34.46% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.97% | -44.55% | -10.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -2.46% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.07% | -14.90% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.07% | 8.75% | -3.68% |
Volatility
PRYMY vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
Prysmian SPA ADR (PRYMY) has a higher volatility of 18.57% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 12.77%. This indicates that PRYMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRYMY | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.57% | 12.77% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.67% | 25.11% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.69% | 32.08% | +5.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 29.93% | +4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.74% | 29.96% | +5.78% |
Dividends
PRYMY vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
PRYMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than ETN's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.02% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
PRYMY Prysmian SPA ADR | 0.58% | 0.88% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 0.49% | 2.57% | 5.65% | 2.45% | 3.61% | 0.00% |
Financials
PRYMY vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prysmian SPA ADR and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRYMY vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
PRYMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prysmian SPA ADR reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 5.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PRYMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prysmian SPA ADR reported an operating income of 333.00M and revenue of 5.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PRYMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prysmian SPA ADR reported a net income of 246.00M and revenue of 5.22B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 866.00M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRYMY and ETN have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRYMY has higher volatility (18.57%) compared to ETN (12.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRYMY dropped -58.18% vs ETN's -68.95%.
PRYMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRYMY and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer