PRU vs. DGRO
PRU (Prudential Financial, Inc.) is a stock, while DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, PRU returned 9.20%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for DGRO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PRU vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRU achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PRU has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 9.20%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.
PRU
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- -2.39%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
PRU vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | -1.27% | 0.18% | 19.46% | 10.09% | -3.86% | 45.32% | -11.40% | 20.10% | -26.46% | 13.65% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.19% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRU and DGRO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PRU and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRU vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
PRU
DGRO
PRU vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.42 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 3.45 | -3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 13.31 | -12.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRU vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRU drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRU and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.53% | -35.10% | -53.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.46% | -6.47% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -14.03% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | -19.31% | -13.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.89% | -35.10% | -30.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.48% | -0.90% | -8.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.30% | -3.43% | -14.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.95% | 1.67% | +8.28% |
Volatility
PRU vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.63%. This indicates that PRU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 2.63% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.52% | 6.94% | +10.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 9.53% | +13.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 13.80% | +11.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 16.60% | +15.13% |
Dividends
PRU vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
PRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than DGRO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.97% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5.07% | 4.78% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 4.83% | 4.25% | 5.64% | 4.27% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 2.69% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRU and DGRO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRU has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to DGRO (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRU dropped -88.53% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRU and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer