PRNT vs. GXPT
PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PRNT tracks the Total 3D-Printing Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
PRNT vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 16.86% return.
PRNT
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- -9.14%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRNT vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 8.58% | 0.38% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRNT and GXPT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRNT vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
PRNT
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PRNT vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRNT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRNT vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRNT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.10% | -18.74% | -47.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.82% | -8.72% | -42.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -5.04% | -27.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | — | — |
Volatility
PRNT vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRNT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 22.91% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.19% | 22.91% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 22.91% | +3.87% |
PRNT vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRNT vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.80% | 2.16% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRNT and GXPT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.
PRNT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for PRNT and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer