PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNT vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRNT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PRNT has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 2.37%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.


PRNT

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.69%
6M
4.38%
YTD
6.62%
1Y
12.49%
3Y*
-0.12%
5Y*
-8.69%
10Y*
2.37%
ALL TIME*
2.20%

VUG

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.35%
6M
6.39%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$141.16K$162.57K$305.15K
$556.11M$661.72M$650.91M

PRNT vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
6.62%6.70%-8.72%13.37%-40.26%8.99%40.18%13.06%-17.81%18.03%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.02%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and VUG is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2016

0.69

The correlation between PRNT and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRNT vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRNT
VUG

Technology

47.6%
56.2%

Industrials

31.1%
5.3%

Healthcare

12.1%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
11.5%

Basic Materials

3.1%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
1.4%

Communication Services

-

15.4%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

3.8%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Technology

PRNT
47.6%
VUG
56.2%

Industrials

PRNT
31.1%
VUG
5.3%

Healthcare

PRNT
12.1%
VUG
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PRNT
6.0%
VUG
11.5%

Basic Materials

PRNT
3.1%
VUG
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

PRNT
0.1%
VUG
1.4%

Communication Services

PRNT

-

VUG
15.4%

Energy

PRNT

-

VUG
0.3%

Financial Services

PRNT

-

VUG
3.8%

Real Estate

PRNT

-

VUG
1.0%

Utilities

PRNT

-

VUG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRNT vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRNT
PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRNT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNTVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.13

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

0.78

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

2.47

-0.77

PRNT vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNTVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.10%

-50.68%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-16.53%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.55%

-22.85%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.91%

-35.61%

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.10%

-35.61%

-30.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.70%

-5.53%

-46.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.25%

-7.08%

-25.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

5.20%

+1.41%

Volatility

PRNT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 5.61% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNTVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

5.58%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.43%

14.24%

+4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.22%

17.74%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.17%

22.49%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

21.55%

+5.19%

PRNT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRNT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than VUG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
0.73%0.78%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.80%2.16%0.01%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.40%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRNT and VUG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRNT has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to VUG (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.38% vs 2.37% for PRNT. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

PRNT has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.40% for VUG.

PRNT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRNT and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer