PRNT vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PRNT tracks the Total 3D-Printing Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRNT returned -9.14%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

PRNT vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 5.00% return.

PRNT

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -3.97%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 6M: 8.32%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: 3.25%
• 5Y*: -9.14%
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	8.58%	6.70%	-8.72%	13.37%	-40.26%	8.99%	20.34%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	5.00%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and GINN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020	0.84

The correlation between PRNT and GINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRNT vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRNT	GINN
Technology	51.9%	32.6%
Industrials	28.5%	4.7%
Healthcare	11.7%	20.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	12.7%
Basic Materials	2.8%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	1.8%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Energy	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	12.4%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 22
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 35
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRNT	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	1.22	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.75	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.22	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	1.54	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.81	5.39	-2.58

PRNT vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-41.25%	-24.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-13.18%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.00%	-22.25%	-9.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.91%	-41.25%	-16.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.82%	-4.93%	-45.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.04%	-13.28%	-18.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.96%	3.75%	+2.21%

Volatility

PRNT vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.81%. This indicates that PRNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	5.81%	+3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.46%	12.92%	+5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.04%	16.57%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.19%	21.44%	+4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.78%	21.07%	+5.71%

PRNT vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRNT vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than GINN's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.72%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRNT and GINN in my portfolio?

PRNT and GINN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRNT or GINN?

PRNT has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, PRNT or GINN?

On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 5.45% vs -9.14% for PRNT. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRNT or GINN?

Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 5.45% return vs -9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRNT or GINN?

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRNT or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.72% for PRNT.

What is the main difference between PRNT and GINN?

PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.