PRMR vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PRMR (PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PRMR is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRMR charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

PRMR vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMR achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 8.71% return.

PRMR

• 1D: -3.37%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 7.24%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 8.71%
• 6M: 8.42%
• 1Y: 25.81%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 14.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMR vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF	7.24%	-0.32%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	8.71%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMR and SPTM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

PRMR vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 66
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMR vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRMR	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.45	+0.60

Drawdowns

PRMR vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRMR	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-54.80%	+45.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-2.80%	-1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-9.05%	+6.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRMR	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	12.16%	+1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.04%	16.90%	-2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.04%	18.05%	-4.01%

PRMR vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRMR vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

PRMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.06%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRMR and SPTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PRMR and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PRMR or SPTM?

On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRMR or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for PRMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRMR or SPTM?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for PRMR.

What is the main difference between PRMR and SPTM?

They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 0.03% for SPTM.