PRMR vs. SPTM
PRMR (PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PRMR is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRMR charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
PRMR vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRMR achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 8.46% return.
PRMR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.07%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
PRMR vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF | 10.98% | -0.71% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 8.46% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRMR and SPTM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRMR vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
PRMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPTM
PRMR vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRMR | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRMR vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRMR | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -54.80% | +45.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -3.03% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -9.03% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility
PRMR vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRMR | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.87% | 12.45% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 16.95% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 18.03% | -3.16% |
PRMR vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRMR vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
PRMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.09% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PRMR and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for PRMR.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for PRMR.
They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 0.03% for SPTM.
Find the right allocation for PRMR and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer