PRMR vs. CNAV
PRMR (PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRMR charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.
Performance
PRMR vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRMR achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 46.16% return.
PRMR
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAV
- 1D
- -6.27%
- 1M
- 10.31%
- YTD
- 46.16%
- 6M
- 43.90%
- 1Y
- 72.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRMR vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF | 10.32% | -0.71% |
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 46.16% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRMR and CNAV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRMR vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank
PRMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CNAV
PRMR vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRMR | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRMR vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and CNAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRMR | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -30.06% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -6.27% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -5.38% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility
PRMR vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRMR | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 28.97% | -14.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 29.02% | -14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 29.02% | -14.09% |
PRMR vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRMR vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRMR nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRMR and CNAV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRMR is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRMR is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
PRMR and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 1.31% for CNAV.
Find the right allocation for PRMR and CNAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer