PRMR vs. CNAV
PRMR (PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRMR charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.
Performance
PRMR vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRMR achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 26.09% return.
PRMR
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CNAV
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 1Y
- 40.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $251.45K | $267.46K | $338.99K | |
| $1.55M | $877.31K | $463.95K |
PRMR vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF | 12.58% | -0.71% |
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 26.09% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRMR and CNAV is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRMR vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank
PRMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CNAV
PRMR vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRMR | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRMR vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and CNAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRMR | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -30.06% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -19.14% | +17.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -5.87% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.91% | — |
Volatility
PRMR vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRMR | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 34.30% | -19.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 31.42% | -16.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 31.42% | -16.39% |
PRMR vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRMR vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRMR nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRMR and CNAV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRMR is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRMR is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
PRMR and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 1.31% for CNAV.
Find the right allocation for PRMR and CNAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer