PRMR vs. PSCX
PRMR (PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRMR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by PeakShares, while PSCX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PRMR charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
PRMR vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRMR achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 6.99% return.
PRMR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 18.12%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.64M | $871.58K | $473.34K | |
| $30.03K | $18.18K | $35.40K |
PRMR vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF | 15.06% | -0.71% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 6.99% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRMR and PSCX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRMR vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
PRMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCX
PRMR vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRMR | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRMR vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRMR | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -10.20% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -1.82% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility
PRMR vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRMR | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.21% | 5.66% | +9.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 7.15% | +8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 6.94% | +8.27% |
PRMR vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRMR vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRMR nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRMR and PSCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for PRMR.
PRMR and PSCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PRMR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSCX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 0.75% for PSCX.
Find the right allocation for PRMR and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer