PRMR vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PRMR (PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PRMR is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRMR charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

PRMR vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRMR

• 1D: -3.37%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 7.24%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -0.97%
• 1Y: 1.72%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMR vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF	7.24%	-0.32%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMR and DFND is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

PRMR vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 13
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 12
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMR vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF (PRMR) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRMR	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.36	+0.70

Drawdowns

PRMR vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMR drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMR and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRMR	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-22.65%	+13.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-3.69%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-5.70%	+3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRMR	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	10.88%	+3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.04%	22.44%	-8.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.04%	19.08%	-5.04%

PRMR vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMR has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRMR vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

PRMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
PRMR PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRMR and DFND in my portfolio?

PRMR and DFND have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRMR or DFND?

On fees, PRMR is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRMR or DFND?

PRMR is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRMR or DFND?

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for PRMR.

What is the main difference between PRMR and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for PRMR and 1.50% for DFND.