PRIGX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
PRIGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 25, 2012. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
PRIGX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRIGX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIGX T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund | 0.29% | 31.10% | 13.34% | 13.25% | -7.86% | 16.08% | 11.35% | 25.56% | -13.70% | 19.57% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRIGX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PRIGX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 11.12%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
PRIGX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRIGX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRIGX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRIGX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PRIGX
FGIAX
PRIGX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRIGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.75 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 2.26 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.61 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 12.12 | -3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRIGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.75 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.58 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.42 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRIGX and FGIAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRIGX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
PRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIGX T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund | 7.17% | 7.20% | 6.53% | 1.75% | 0.98% | 5.81% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 9.08% | 7.35% | 2.25% | 9.12% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
PRIGX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRIGX drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIGX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRIGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.76% | -49.35% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -8.29% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -21.08% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.76% | -38.02% | +1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.58% | -3.78% | -7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -7.22% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.78% | +1.09% |
Volatility
PRIGX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that PRIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRIGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 4.05% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 7.09% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 12.28% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 13.08% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 15.17% | +1.22% |