PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly higher than VBK's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has outperformed VBK with an annualized return of 11.70%, while VBK has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.


PRFZ

1D
1.26%
1M
2.57%
6M
13.47%
YTD
19.43%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
10.13%

VBK

1D
1.50%
1M
-2.25%
6M
8.68%
YTD
15.49%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
19.43%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
15.49%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and VBK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2006

0.93

The correlation between PRFZ and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
VBK

Technology

19.5%
27.1%

Healthcare

17.8%
17.9%

Industrials

16.1%
23.4%

Financial Services

13.6%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
8.9%

Real Estate

6.9%
3.7%

Energy

4.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.6%

Utilities

1.3%
1.1%

Technology

PRFZ
19.5%
VBK
27.1%

Healthcare

PRFZ
17.8%
VBK
17.9%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.1%
VBK
23.4%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.6%
VBK
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
11.2%
VBK
8.9%

Real Estate

PRFZ
6.9%
VBK
3.7%

Energy

PRFZ
4.4%
VBK
3.4%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.2%
VBK
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
3.0%
VBK
2.0%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.9%
VBK
3.6%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.3%
VBK
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFZVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.15

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

7.71

+2.70

PRFZ vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than VBK's maximum drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-58.68%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-11.44%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

-27.54%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-38.39%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-38.70%

-5.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-4.80%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-10.11%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.19%

-0.15%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 3.74%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.87%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

15.76%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

20.19%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

23.63%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

22.89%

-0.51%

PRFZ vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than VBK's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.79%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PRFZ and VBK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to PRFZ (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.70% vs 11.08% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.44% for VBK.

PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VBK is Small Cap Growth Equities. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.05% for VBK.

PRFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer