PRFZ vs. SPHQ
PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ returned 12.16%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRFZ having a 16.06% return and SPHQ slightly higher at 16.54%. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 12.16%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
SPHQ
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 16.06% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.54% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and SPHQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2006 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PRFZ and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRFZ
SPHQ
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
PRFZ
SPHQ
Healthcare
PRFZ
SPHQ
Industrials
PRFZ
SPHQ
Financial Services
PRFZ
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PRFZ
SPHQ
Real Estate
PRFZ
SPHQ
-
Energy
PRFZ
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PRFZ
SPHQ
Communication Services
PRFZ
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PRFZ
SPHQ
Utilities
PRFZ
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
SPHQ
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFZ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.92 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 12.48 | -1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -57.83% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -8.90% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.54% | -16.57% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -25.04% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -31.60% | -12.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -2.93% | +2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -10.68% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.07% | +0.94% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 5.54%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 5.88% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 11.30% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 13.46% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 16.59% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 17.91% | +4.53% |
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.81% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFZ and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to PRFZ (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.46% vs 12.16% for PRFZ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.81% for PRFZ.
PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFZ and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer