PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRFZ having a 15.55% return and SCHF slightly lower at 15.39%. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 11.95%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.


PRFZ

1D
0.87%
1M
6.43%
YTD
15.55%
6M
12.59%
1Y
35.58%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
11.95%

SCHF

1D
0.29%
1M
3.90%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.24%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
15.55%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.39%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and SCHF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.75

The correlation between PRFZ and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
SCHF

Technology

19.6%
17.6%

Healthcare

16.8%
7.0%

Industrials

16.6%
18.1%

Financial Services

13.2%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
7.3%

Real Estate

7.2%
2.0%

Energy

5.0%
4.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
7.4%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
5.7%

Utilities

1.5%
3.2%

Technology

PRFZ
19.6%
SCHF
17.6%

Healthcare

PRFZ
16.8%
SCHF
7.0%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.6%
SCHF
18.1%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.2%
SCHF
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
10.8%
SCHF
7.3%

Real Estate

PRFZ
7.2%
SCHF
2.0%

Energy

PRFZ
5.0%
SCHF
4.7%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.5%
SCHF
7.4%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.9%
SCHF
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
2.8%
SCHF
5.7%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.5%
SCHF
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFZSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.64

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

10.14

+0.87

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-34.87%

-27.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-11.48%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

-13.41%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-29.14%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-34.87%

-9.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.00%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-7.37%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.99%

+0.02%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 5.92%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

6.91%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

14.42%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

16.67%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

16.56%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

17.24%

+5.22%

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.82%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFZ and SCHF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to PRFZ (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.95% vs 10.82% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.82% for PRFZ.

PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer