PRFZ vs. PXH
PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ returned 11.95%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for PXH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PXH.
Performance
PRFZ vs. PXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly higher than PXH's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has outperformed PXH with an annualized return of 11.95%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 35.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
PXH
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
PRFZ vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 15.55% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 12.73% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and PXH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PRFZ and PXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRFZ vs. PXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRFZ
PXH
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
PRFZ
PXH
Healthcare
PRFZ
PXH
Industrials
PRFZ
PXH
Financial Services
PRFZ
PXH
Consumer Cyclical
PRFZ
PXH
Real Estate
PRFZ
PXH
Energy
PRFZ
PXH
Basic Materials
PRFZ
PXH
Communication Services
PRFZ
PXH
Consumer Defensive
PRFZ
PXH
Utilities
PRFZ
PXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
PXH
PRFZ vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFZ | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.85 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 10.21 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, roughly equal to the maximum PXH drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and PXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -63.63% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -10.24% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.54% | -17.72% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -29.59% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -40.42% | -3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.27% | +3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -16.84% | +7.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.85% | +0.16% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 5.92%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 6.41% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 13.09% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 15.90% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 17.87% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 20.06% | +2.40% |
PRFZ vs. PXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PXH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than PXH's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.49% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFZ and PXH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXH has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to PRFZ (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs PXH's -63.63%.
On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.95% vs 10.91% for PXH. On fees, PRFZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRFZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.82% for PRFZ.
PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PXH is Emerging Markets Equities. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.50% for PXH.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFZ and PXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer