PRFZ vs. PRF
PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ returned 12.16%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for PRF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.
Performance
PRFZ vs. PRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly higher than PRF's 14.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has underperformed PRF with an annualized return of 12.16%, while PRF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
PRF
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 31.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
PRFZ vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 16.06% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 14.83% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 16.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and PRF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PRFZ and PRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRFZ vs. PRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRFZ
PRF
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
PRFZ
PRF
Healthcare
PRFZ
PRF
Industrials
PRFZ
PRF
Financial Services
PRFZ
PRF
Consumer Cyclical
PRFZ
PRF
Real Estate
PRFZ
PRF
Energy
PRFZ
PRF
Basic Materials
PRFZ
PRF
Communication Services
PRFZ
PRF
Consumer Defensive
PRFZ
PRF
Utilities
PRFZ
PRF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
PRF
PRFZ vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFZ | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.52 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.75 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 19.37 | -8.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, roughly equal to the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and PRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -60.35% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -6.59% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.54% | -15.82% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -19.72% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -38.16% | -6.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -1.39% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -6.91% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.61% | +1.40% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 3.70%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 3.70% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 8.24% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 10.99% | +7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 15.20% | +6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 17.65% | +4.79% |
PRFZ vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than PRF's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.39% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.81% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFZ and PRF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRFZ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to PRF (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs PRF's -60.35%.
On 10-year performance, PRF leads with 13.99% vs 12.16% for PRFZ. On fees, PRF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.
PRF has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.81% for PRFZ.
PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PRF is Large Cap Value Equities. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.34% for PRF.
PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFZ and PRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer