PRF vs. SCHC
PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRF returned 13.91%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for SCHC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
PRF vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PRF has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 13.91%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.48% annualized return.
PRF
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 32.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
PRF vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 15.65% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 16.01% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRF and SCHC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PRF and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRF vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRF
SCHC
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
PRF
SCHC
Financial Services
PRF
SCHC
Healthcare
PRF
SCHC
Communication Services
PRF
SCHC
Industrials
PRF
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
PRF
SCHC
Energy
PRF
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
PRF
SCHC
Basic Materials
PRF
SCHC
Utilities
PRF
SCHC
Real Estate
PRF
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRF vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
PRF
SCHC
PRF vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRF | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.27 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.90 | 1.93 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.07 | 7.12 | +12.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRF vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRF | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.35% | -43.94% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -12.48% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -15.52% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -36.48% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.16% | -43.94% | +5.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -3.49% | +3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -10.04% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 3.38% | -1.77% |
Volatility
PRF vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is 3.60%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that PRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRF | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 6.31% | -2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.17% | 13.88% | -5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 16.21% | -5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 17.62% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 18.02% | -0.34% |
PRF vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRF vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than SCHC's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.37% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRF and SCHC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to PRF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 10-year performance, PRF leads with 13.91% vs 8.48% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 1.37% for PRF.
PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.11% for SCHC.
PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRF and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer