PRF vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRF returned 13.94%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for RODM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

PRF vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PRF has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 13.94%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.

PRF

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 16.44%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 13.06%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

RODM

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 11.64%
• 6M: 12.64%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 9.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRF vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	16.44%	18.33%	16.73%	15.72%	-7.79%	31.12%	7.78%	27.42%	-8.71%	16.01%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	11.64%	34.42%	8.02%	15.76%	-14.54%	11.11%	-0.62%	17.15%	-9.97%	25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PRF and RODM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015	0.70

The correlation between PRF and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRF vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRF	RODM
Technology	23.1%	10.8%
Financial Services	15.4%	25.9%
Healthcare	12.0%	8.9%
Communication Services	9.4%	5.5%
Industrials	8.9%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	5.8%
Energy	7.9%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	4.0%
Basic Materials	3.3%	6.4%
Utilities	3.0%	4.9%
Real Estate	2.4%	3.5%

Return for Risk

PRF vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 93
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 78
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRF vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRF	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	2.33	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	3.26	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.42	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.23	3.60	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.40	14.32	+7.08

PRF vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRF Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRF and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRF vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRF	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.35%	-35.98%	-24.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.59%	-7.10%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.82%	-10.58%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-28.85%	+9.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.16%	-35.98%	-2.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.84%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.92%	-6.36%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	1.78%	-0.17%

Volatility

PRF vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRF	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.64%	3.58%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	8.77%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.93%	11.01%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	13.48%	+1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	15.22%	+2.47%

PRF vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRF vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than RODM's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.36%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.78%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRF and RODM in my portfolio?

PRF and RODM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRF or RODM?

PRF has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, PRF or RODM?

On 10-year performance, PRF leads with 13.94% vs 9.24% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRF or RODM?

Over the 10-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.94% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRF or RODM?

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRF or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.36% for PRF.

What is the main difference between PRF and RODM?

PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RODM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.