PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRE.L vs. GGP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Pensana Rare Earths PLC (PRE.L) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRE.L achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than GGP.L's 38.21% return.


PRE.L

1D
-2.30%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
5.77%
6M
-8.78%
1Y
128.05%
3Y*
46.48%
5Y*
-3.02%
10Y*

GGP.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
38.21%
6M
75.73%
1Y
150.17%
3Y*
66.68%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
60.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRE.L
Pensana Rare Earths PLC
5.77%275.37%8.53%-51.24%-55.07%-9.95%307.41%
GGP.L
Greatland Gold plc
38.21%309.83%-35.50%23.25%-50.00%-56.64%207.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PRE.L and GGP.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2020

0.11

Fundamentals

EPS

PRE.L:

-£0.05

GGP.L:

£0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRE.L:

£0.00

GGP.L:

£937.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRE.L:

-£28.36K

GGP.L:

£483.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

PRE.L:

-£13.84M

GGP.L:

£477.73M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRE.L vs. GGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRE.L
PRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GGP.L
GGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pensana Rare Earths PLC (PRE.L) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRE.LGGP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

4.26

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

11.07

-7.53

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the GGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRE.L and GGP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRE.LGGP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.32

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.19

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.15

+0.11

Drawdowns

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRE.L drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, roughly equal to the maximum GGP.L drawdown of -98.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRE.L and GGP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRE.LGGP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.56%

-98.48%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.37%

-35.27%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.74%

-55.65%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.77%

-76.82%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.39%

-9.31%

-45.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.53%

-65.14%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.01%

13.56%

+22.45%

Volatility

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pensana Rare Earths PLC (PRE.L) is 10.27%, while Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that PRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRE.LGGP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.27%

13.36%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.93%

41.94%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.90%

64.87%

+16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.03%

64.86%

+21.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.26%

90.94%

-1.68%

Dividends

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRE.L nor GGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PRE.L vs. GGP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pensana Rare Earths PLC and Greatland Gold plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M202120222023202420250
478.24M
(PRE.L) Total Revenue
(GGP.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRE.L and GGP.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRE.L and GGP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer