PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRE.L vs. FRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Pensana Rare Earths PLC (PRE.L) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRE.L achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly higher than FRES.L's -2.86% return.


PRE.L

1D
-2.30%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
5.77%
6M
-8.78%
1Y
128.05%
3Y*
46.48%
5Y*
-3.02%
10Y*

FRES.L

1D
-3.71%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
19.06%
1Y
164.20%
3Y*
71.49%
5Y*
33.23%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRE.L
Pensana Rare Earths PLC
5.77%275.37%8.53%-51.24%-55.07%-9.95%307.41%
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
-2.86%468.22%6.13%-32.98%3.90%-18.79%28.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PRE.L and FRES.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2020

0.10

The correlation between PRE.L and FRES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PRE.L:

-£0.05

FRES.L:

£2.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRE.L:

£0.00

FRES.L:

£8.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRE.L:

-£28.36K

FRES.L:

£3.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRE.L:

-£13.84M

FRES.L:

£3.90B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRE.L vs. FRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRE.L
PRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FRES.L
FRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pensana Rare Earths PLC (PRE.L) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRE.LFRES.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

2.98

-1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

3.24

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

5.26

-2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.54

12.45

-8.91

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the FRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRE.L and FRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRE.LFRES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.98

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.79

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.28

-0.02

Drawdowns

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRE.L drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, which is greater than FRES.L's maximum drawdown of -82.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRE.L and FRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRE.LFRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.56%

-82.36%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.37%

-31.03%

-22.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.74%

-35.33%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.77%

-53.75%

-36.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.39%

-27.19%

-27.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.53%

-40.32%

-23.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.01%

13.14%

+22.87%

Volatility

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pensana Rare Earths PLC (PRE.L) is 10.27%, while Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) has a volatility of 19.88%. This indicates that PRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRE.LFRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.27%

19.88%

-9.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.93%

42.16%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.90%

54.69%

+26.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.03%

42.30%

+43.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.26%

43.35%

+45.91%

Dividends

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison

PRE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
3.00%2.00%1.35%1.98%2.44%2.66%1.00%2.35%3.49%1.74%0.74%0.47%
PRE.L
Pensana Rare Earths PLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PRE.L vs. FRES.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pensana Rare Earths PLC and Fresnillo plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B202120222023202420250
2.59B
(PRE.L) Total Revenue
(FRES.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRE.L and FRES.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRE.L and FRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer