PRDSF vs. ADM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).

Performance

PRDSF vs. ADM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRDSF vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRDSF Prada S.p.A	-17.60%	-27.24%	49.21%	1.11%	-5.79%	-13.67%	97.14%	10.81%	-1.82%	-9.37%
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company	27.39%	18.24%	-27.52%	-20.42%	39.98%	37.33%	12.44%	17.10%	5.28%	-9.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PRDSF : $11.92B ADM : $35.18B
EPS PRDSF : $0.66 ADM : $2.23
PE Ratio PRDSF : 7.06 ADM : 32.64
PS Ratio PRDSF : 1.07 ADM : 0.44
Total Revenue (TTM) PRDSF : $11.13B ADM : $80.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) PRDSF : $8.92B ADM : $5.03B
EBITDA (TTM) PRDSF : $3.40B ADM : $2.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDSF achieves a -17.60% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 27.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDSF has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of 5.12%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.

PRDSF

• 1D: -7.23%
• 1M: -6.99%
• YTD: -17.60%
• 6M: -17.67%
• 1Y: -31.49%
• 3Y*: -10.59%
• 5Y*: -5.00%
• 10Y*: 5.12%

ADM

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 27.39%
• 6M: 23.63%
• 1Y: 56.75%
• 3Y*: 0.24%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 10.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PRDSF vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRDSF

PRDSF Risk / Return Rank: 16
PRDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
PRDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PRDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PRDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PRDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 12

ADM

ADM Risk / Return Rank: 90
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRDSF vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRDSF	ADM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	2.01	-2.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	2.68	-3.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.35	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	4.30	-5.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	12.30	-13.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRDSF vs. ADM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the ADM Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDSF and ADM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRDSF	ADM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	2.01	-2.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.28	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.39	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.25	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between PRDSF and ADM is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PRDSF vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison

PRDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than ADM's 2.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRDSF Prada S.p.A	3.97%	3.27%	1.81%	2.19%	1.49%	0.73%	0.00%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company	2.82%	3.55%	3.96%	2.49%	1.72%	2.19%	2.86%	3.02%	3.27%	3.19%	2.63%	3.05%

Drawdowns

PRDSF vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDSF drawdown since its inception was -75.14%, which is greater than ADM's maximum drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSF and ADM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRDSF	ADM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.14%	-68.01%	-7.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.44%	-13.32%	-24.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.25%	-54.14%	+6.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.37%	-54.14%	-2.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.52%	-17.41%	-32.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.45%	-21.63%	-19.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.03%	4.65%	+17.38%

Volatility

PRDSF vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison

Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) at 9.85%. This indicates that PRDSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRDSF	ADM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.89%	9.85%	+4.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.28%	19.51%	+22.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.31%	28.31%	+34.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.20%	27.92%	+28.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.77%	26.91%	+25.86%

Financials

PRDSF vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prada S.p.A and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PRDSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a gross profit of 2.38B and revenue of 2.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.

ADM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.59B and revenue of 18.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.

PRDSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prada S.p.A reported an operating income of 712.40M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.

ADM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

PRDSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a net income of 463.48M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.

ADM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 456.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.