PRDSF vs. ADM
PRDSF (Prada S.p.A) and ADM (Archer-Daniels-Midland Company) are both stocks. PRDSF operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while ADM operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PRDSF returned 4.96%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for ADM. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRDSF vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRDSF achieves a -16.28% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 42.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDSF has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of 4.96%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.55% annualized return.
PRDSF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- -16.28%
- 6M
- -15.84%
- 1Y
- -25.10%
- 3Y*
- -10.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
ADM
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 42.75%
- 6M
- 39.07%
- 1Y
- 77.67%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
PRDSF vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDSF Prada S.p.A | -16.28% | -27.24% | 49.21% | 1.11% | -5.79% | -13.67% | 97.14% | 10.81% | -1.82% | -9.37% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 42.75% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRDSF and ADM is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
PRDSF:
$12.05B
ADM:
$39.17B
PRDSF:
$0.66
ADM:
$2.23
PRDSF:
7.14
ADM:
36.23
PRDSF:
1.08
ADM:
0.49
PRDSF:
2.60
ADM:
1.72
PRDSF:
$11.13B
ADM:
$80.61B
PRDSF:
$8.92B
ADM:
$4.70B
PRDSF:
$3.40B
ADM:
$3.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRDSF vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank
PRDSF
ADM
PRDSF vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRDSF | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.45 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 6.11 | -6.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 17.02 | -18.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRDSF | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.88 | -3.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.22 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.36 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.26 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
PRDSF vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRDSF drawdown since its inception was -75.14%, which is greater than ADM's maximum drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSF and ADM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRDSF | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.14% | -68.01% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.52% | -12.79% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.86% | -49.22% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.86% | -54.14% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.37% | -54.14% | -2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.72% | -7.45% | -41.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -21.60% | -19.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.96% | 4.58% | +14.38% |
Volatility
PRDSF vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) is 7.12%, while Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that PRDSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRDSF | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 7.82% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.57% | 19.32% | +9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.57% | 27.10% | +30.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.22% | 28.23% | +26.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.99% | 26.95% | +26.04% |
Dividends
PRDSF vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
PRDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ADM's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.55% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
PRDSF Prada S.p.A | 0.52% | 3.27% | 1.81% | 2.19% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PRDSF vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prada S.p.A and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRDSF vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison
PRDSF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a gross profit of 2.38B and revenue of 2.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
PRDSF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prada S.p.A reported an operating income of 712.40M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
PRDSF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a net income of 463.48M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRDSF and ADM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADM has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to PRDSF (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDSF dropped -75.14% vs ADM's -68.01%.
ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRDSF and ADM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer