PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PRDSF vs. MC.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

PRDSF vs. MC.PA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA).

Performance

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRDSF
Prada S.p.A		-17.60%-27.24%49.21%1.11%-5.79%-13.67%97.14%10.81%-1.82%-9.37%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		-29.26%17.89%-17.19%13.07%-10.48%34.03%35.70%60.00%2.30%57.40%
Different Trading Currencies

PRDSF is traded in USD, while MC.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MC.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDSF achieves a -17.60% return, which is significantly higher than MC.PA's -29.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDSF has underperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 5.12%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.20% annualized return.

PRDSF

1D
-7.23%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
-17.60%
6M
-17.67%
1Y
-31.49%
3Y*
-10.59%
5Y*
-5.00%
10Y*
5.12%

MC.PA

1D
0.85%
1M
-16.64%
YTD
-29.26%
6M
-11.48%
1Y
-11.23%
3Y*
-14.71%
5Y*
-2.78%
10Y*
14.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Prada S.p.A

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Often compared with PRDSF:
PRDSF vs. JLGMXPRDSF vs. LVMUYPRDSF vs. ELPRDSF vs. ADM
Often compared with MC.PA:
MC.PA vs. LVMUYMC.PA vs. RMS.PAMC.PA vs. KER.PAMC.PA vs. CDI.PAMC.PA vs. LRLCYMC.PA vs. CLHMC.PA vs. ELF

Return for Risk

PRDSF vs. MC.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PRDSF
PRDSF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PRDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PRDSFMC.PADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

-0.33

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

-0.26

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.97

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.28

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-0.78

-0.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDSF and MC.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PRDSFMC.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

-0.33

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

-0.09

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.47

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.36

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between PRDSF and MC.PA is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

PRDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than MC.PA's 2.81% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDSF
Prada S.p.A		3.97%3.27%1.81%2.19%1.49%0.73%0.00%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		2.81%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%

Drawdowns

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDSF drawdown since its inception was -75.14%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -61.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSF and MC.PA.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

PRDSFMC.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.14%

-70.25%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.44%

-30.11%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.25%

-49.03%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.37%

-49.03%

-7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.52%

-45.58%

-3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.45%

-16.24%

-25.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.03%

11.94%

+10.09%

Volatility

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 8.21%. This indicates that PRDSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

PRDSFMC.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.89%

8.21%

+5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.28%

23.54%

+18.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.31%

33.91%

+28.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.20%

31.90%

+24.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.77%

29.53%

+23.24%

Financials

PRDSF vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prada S.p.A and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. PRDSF values in USD, MC.PA values in EUR