PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRDSF vs. BCUCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDSF achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly higher than BCUCY's -12.53% return.


PRDSF

1D
4.58%
1M
2.59%
6M
-1.64%
YTD
-10.77%
1Y
-5.33%
3Y*
-8.29%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
5.96%
ALL TIME*
0.95%

BCUCY

1D
0.75%
1M
7.05%
6M
8.12%
YTD
-12.53%
1Y
-8.70%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$188.95K$169.27K$484.70K
$13.12K$7.76K$10.43K

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRDSF
Prada S.p.A
-10.77%-27.24%49.21%1.11%-5.79%-13.67%97.14%22.58%
BCUCY
Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR
-12.53%7.17%13.09%35.15%2.92%55.41%25.75%1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PRDSF and BCUCY is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2019

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRDSF:

$12.85B

BCUCY:

$6.81B

EPS

PRDSF:

€0.64

BCUCY:

€0.37

PE Ratio

PRDSF:

6.80

BCUCY:

23.44

PEG Ratio

PRDSF:

0.21

BCUCY:

0.88

PS Ratio

PRDSF:

0.95

BCUCY:

2.22

PB Ratio

PRDSF:

2.43

BCUCY:

10.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRDSF:

€11.68B

BCUCY:

€2.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRDSF:

€9.31B

BCUCY:

€1.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRDSF:

€3.74B

BCUCY:

€565.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRDSF vs. BCUCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRDSF
PRDSF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PRDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BCUCY
BCUCY Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BCUCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCUCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCUCY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BCUCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCUCY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) and Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRDSFBCUCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.01

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

-0.23

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

-0.44

+0.26

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the BCUCY Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDSF and BCUCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDSF drawdown since its inception was -75.14%, which is greater than BCUCY's maximum drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSF and BCUCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRDSFBCUCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.14%

-45.36%

-29.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.04%

-36.49%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.86%

-42.50%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-42.50%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.34%

-25.77%

-19.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-17.09%

-24.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.66%

19.40%

-0.74%

Volatility

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prada S.p.A (PRDSF) is 10.59%, while Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR (BCUCY) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that PRDSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCUCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRDSFBCUCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

15.12%

-4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.53%

34.98%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.56%

49.26%

+6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.35%

48.48%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.26%

52.16%

+1.10%

Dividends

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Dividend Comparison

PRDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than BCUCY's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BCUCY
Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR
1.21%0.88%0.89%0.71%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRDSF
Prada S.p.A
0.49%3.27%1.81%2.19%1.49%0.73%0.00%1.89%

Financials

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prada S.p.A and Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PRDSF vs. BCUCY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prada S.p.A and Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PRDSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

BCUCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported a gross profit of -3.89M and revenue of 718.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.5%.

PRDSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Prada S.p.A reported an operating income of 539.26M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

BCUCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported an operating income of 74.26M and revenue of 718.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

PRDSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Prada S.p.A reported a net income of 332.47M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

BCUCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brunello Cucinelli SpA ADR reported a net income of 61.31M and revenue of 718.46M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRDSF and BCUCY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCUCY has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to PRDSF (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDSF dropped -75.14% vs BCUCY's -45.36%.

PRDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRDSF and BCUCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer