PPLT vs. HYMC
PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM, while HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PPLT returned 6.84%/yr vs -4.20%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPLT vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's -1.56% return.
PPLT
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -19.03%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
HYMC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -29.20%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 647.60%
- 3Y*
- 99.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
PPLT vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -24.21% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -17.98% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -1.56% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and HYMC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, PPLT and HYMC have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
HYMC
PPLT vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPLT | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 10.70 | -10.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 26.26 | -25.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -98.89% | +28.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.98% | -61.07% | +17.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.98% | -63.45% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.98% | -93.90% | +49.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.98% | -85.21% | +41.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -63.47% | +23.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 24.84% | -5.54% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 12.58%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.56%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 26.56% | -13.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.67% | 86.12% | -42.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.52% | 118.45% | -67.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.78% | 152.82% | -120.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 122.79% | -93.58% |
Dividends
PPLT vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPLT and HYMC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (26.56%) compared to PPLT (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLT dropped -70.73% vs HYMC's -98.89%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPLT and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer