PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLT vs. ATYM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLT vs. ATYM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PPLT is traded in USD, while ATYM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ATYM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than ATYM.L's -5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLT has underperformed ATYM.L with an annualized return of 3.32%, while ATYM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.45% annualized return.


PPLT

1D
-1.40%
1M
-19.03%
YTD
-24.21%
6M
-28.86%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
3.32%

ATYM.L

1D
3.99%
1M
-8.09%
YTD
-5.99%
6M
-6.62%
1Y
75.58%
3Y*
40.84%
5Y*
24.20%
10Y*
24.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLT vs. ATYM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPLT
abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF
-24.21%124.48%-8.90%-8.18%10.43%-10.75%10.78%20.85%-14.95%2.38%
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
-5.99%159.23%-0.75%17.63%-27.47%87.21%26.15%-4.68%19.78%48.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLT and ATYM.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010

0.21

Over the past year, PPLT and ATYM.L have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLT vs. ATYM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLT
PPLT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PPLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLT vs. ATYM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPLTATYM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

1.90

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

4.58

-3.80

PPLT vs. ATYM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLT and ATYM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPLT vs. ATYM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, smaller than the maximum ATYM.L drawdown of -94.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and ATYM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLTATYM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.73%

-94.59%

+23.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.98%

-39.51%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.98%

-39.51%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.98%

-65.93%

+21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.14%

-71.29%

+20.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.98%

-30.48%

-13.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.94%

-73.20%

+33.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.30%

16.46%

+2.84%

Volatility

PPLT vs. ATYM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) is 12.58%, while Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a volatility of 16.47%. This indicates that PPLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATYM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLTATYM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.58%

16.47%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.67%

40.35%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.52%

47.41%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.78%

42.23%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.21%

41.34%

-12.13%

Dividends

PPLT vs. ATYM.L - Dividend Comparison

PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.75%0.71%1.71%1.91%0.91%7.14%
PPLT
abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPLT and ATYM.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLT and ATYM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer