PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL-PC.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPL-PC.TO achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than EMA-PC.TO's 7.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PPL-PC.TO having a 10.44% annualized return and EMA-PC.TO not far behind at 10.07%.


PPL-PC.TO

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.82%
6M
6.21%
YTD
7.24%
1Y
9.86%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
10.44%
ALL TIME*
6.54%

EMA-PC.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
3.25%
6M
6.86%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
13.39%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
5.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$74.31KCA$156.56KCA$154.27K
CA$156.43KCA$85.45KCA$52.77K

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPL-PC.TO
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
7.24%21.55%32.83%14.31%-18.29%52.16%-5.77%-0.08%-14.42%20.07%
EMA-PC.TO
Emera Incorporated
7.94%15.47%23.62%16.61%-18.92%44.17%3.84%-7.46%-8.81%17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PPL-PC.TO and EMA-PC.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$40.41B

EMA-PC.TO:

CA$18.30B

EPS

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$3.07

EMA-PC.TO:

CA$3.55

PE Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

8.42

EMA-PC.TO:

7.36

PEG Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

0.32

EMA-PC.TO:

0.23

PS Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

1.91

EMA-PC.TO:

0.97

PB Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

0.98

EMA-PC.TO:

0.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$7.88B

EMA-PC.TO:

CA$8.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$2.95B

EMA-PC.TO:

CA$1.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$3.74B

EMA-PC.TO:

CA$2.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPL-PC.TO
PPL-PC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PPL-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA-PC.TO
EMA-PC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMA-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL-PC.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPL-PC.TOEMA-PC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

5.32

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

20.27

-6.63

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPL-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the EMA-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPL-PC.TO and EMA-PC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPL-PC.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.07%, which is greater than EMA-PC.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPL-PC.TO and EMA-PC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPL-PC.TOEMA-PC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.07%

-45.60%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.80%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.57%

-12.62%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-26.10%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.07%

-45.60%

-11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-8.90%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.73%

+0.05%

Volatility

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL-PC.TO) is 2.14%, while Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that PPL-PC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMA-PC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPL-PC.TOEMA-PC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

2.65%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

5.00%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

7.41%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

14.70%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

16.50%

+3.44%

Dividends

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Dividend Comparison

PPL-PC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than EMA-PC.TO's 7.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMA-PC.TO
Emera Incorporated
6.16%6.34%6.85%6.29%6.29%4.83%6.60%6.40%5.02%4.22%4.73%5.20%
PPL-PC.TO
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
4.37%6.07%6.47%6.37%6.83%5.26%7.56%6.64%6.44%5.23%5.95%6.49%

Financials

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and Emera Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in CAD except per share items

PPL-PC.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and Emera Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PPL-PC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a gross profit of 752.00M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

EMA-PC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Emera Incorporated reported a gross profit of 755.00M and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

PPL-PC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported an operating income of 636.00M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

EMA-PC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Emera Incorporated reported an operating income of 625.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

PPL-PC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.

EMA-PC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Emera Incorporated reported a net income of 582.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PPL-PC.TO and EMA-PC.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPL-PC.TO and EMA-PC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer