PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL-PC.TO) and PPL Corporation (PPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PPL-PC.TO is traded in CAD, while PPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PPL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPL-PC.TO achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than PPL's 4.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PPL-PC.TO has outperformed PPL with an annualized return of 11.14%, while PPL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.47% annualized return.


PPL-PC.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
5.04%
6M
5.72%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.14%

PPL

1D
1.86%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
4.44%
6M
8.16%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
4.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPL-PC.TO
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
5.04%21.55%32.83%14.31%-18.29%52.16%-5.77%-0.08%-14.42%20.07%
PPL
PPL Corporation
4.44%6.27%34.64%-5.89%7.50%11.86%-18.28%26.85%5.21%-11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PPL-PC.TO and PPL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2013

0.02

The correlation between PPL-PC.TO and PPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.03 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$14.71B

PPL:

$27.06B

EPS

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$2.90

PPL:

$1.63

PE Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

8.71

PPL:

21.91

PEG Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

0.33

PPL:

18.35

PS Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

1.93

PPL:

2.87

PB Ratio

PPL-PC.TO:

0.97

PPL:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$7.61B

PPL:

$9.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$2.90B

PPL:

$4.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

PPL-PC.TO:

CA$3.41B

PPL:

$3.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPL-PC.TO
PPL-PC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PPL-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPL-PC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PPL
PPL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL-PC.TO) and PPL Corporation (PPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPL-PC.TOPPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.11

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

0.78

+4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.66

1.85

+19.80

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPL-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the PPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPL-PC.TO and PPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPL-PC.TOPPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

0.59

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.64

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.21

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.35

-0.02

Drawdowns

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPL-PC.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.07%, which is greater than PPL's maximum drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPL-PC.TO and PPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPL-PC.TOPPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.07%

-43.70%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-13.24%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.57%

-15.96%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-23.31%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.07%

-43.70%

-13.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-9.39%

+8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-12.36%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

5.53%

-4.75%

Volatility

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL-PC.TO) is 1.57%, while PPL Corporation (PPL) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that PPL-PC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPL-PC.TOPPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

6.07%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

13.49%

-9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.77%

17.35%

-10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

17.70%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

21.73%

-1.71%

Dividends

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Dividend Comparison

PPL-PC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than PPL's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPL
PPL Corporation
3.08%3.11%3.17%3.54%2.99%5.52%5.89%4.60%5.79%5.11%4.46%11.74%
PPL-PC.TO
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
5.95%6.07%6.47%6.37%6.83%5.26%7.56%6.64%6.44%5.23%5.95%6.49%

Financials

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and PPL Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.07B
2.77B
(PPL-PC.TO) Total Revenue
(PPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PPL-PC.TO values in CAD, PPL values in USD

PPL-PC.TO vs. PPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and PPL Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
38.5%
69.3%
Portfolio components
PPL-PC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a gross profit of 795.00M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

PPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PPL Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.

PPL-PC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported an operating income of 669.00M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.

PPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PPL Corporation reported an operating income of 745.00M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.9%.

PPL-PC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a net income of 498.00M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 24.1%.

PPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PPL Corporation reported a net income of 452.00M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PPL-PC.TO and PPL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPL-PC.TO and PPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer