EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO) and BCE Inc. (BCE-PB.TO).
Performance
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA-PC.TO Emera Incorporated | 1.29% | 15.47% | 23.62% | 16.61% | -18.92% | 44.17% | 3.84% | -7.46% | -8.81% | 17.30% |
BCE-PB.TO BCE Inc. | 2.43% | 30.12% | -1.08% | 11.56% | -7.15% | 53.16% | -4.00% | -6.06% | -9.72% | 37.38% |
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMA-PC.TO achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than BCE-PB.TO's 2.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EMA-PC.TO having a 10.16% annualized return and BCE-PB.TO not far ahead at 10.18%.
EMA-PC.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 4.70%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
BCE-PB.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EMA-PC.TO
BCE-PB.TO
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO) and BCE Inc. (BCE-PB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMA-PC.TO | BCE-PB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 2.46 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 3.14 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.57 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.94 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 12.05 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMA-PC.TO | BCE-PB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.46 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 1.11 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.66 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.26 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMA-PC.TO and BCE-PB.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMA-PC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than BCE-PB.TO's 5.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMA-PC.TO Emera Incorporated | 6.36% | 6.34% | 6.85% | 6.29% | 6.29% | 4.83% | 6.60% | 6.40% | 5.02% | 4.22% | 4.73% | 5.20% |
BCE-PB.TO BCE Inc. | 5.84% | 6.14% | 10.23% | 9.43% | 5.66% | 2.96% | 4.95% | 6.42% | 5.16% | 3.58% | 4.40% | 5.05% |
Drawdowns
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMA-PC.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, smaller than the maximum BCE-PB.TO drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA-PC.TO and BCE-PB.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMA-PC.TO | BCE-PB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.60% | -54.96% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -9.24% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.10% | -14.53% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.60% | -54.96% | +9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -2.12% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -12.32% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.25% | -0.52% |
Volatility
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO) is 1.46%, while BCE Inc. (BCE-PB.TO) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that EMA-PC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCE-PB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMA-PC.TO | BCE-PB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.70% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 5.34% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.68% | 10.89% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 11.07% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 15.57% | +1.25% |
Financials
EMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emera Incorporated and BCE Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities