PPH vs. PBD
PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) and PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while PBD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPH returned 8.39%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for PBD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPH charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PBD.
Performance
PPH vs. PBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than PBD's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has underperformed PBD with an annualized return of 8.39%, while PBD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.
PPH
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
PBD
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 6M
- 27.73%
- 1Y
- 72.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- -5.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
PPH vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.96% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 5.49% | 19.39% | -5.89% | 15.23% |
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 28.03% | 43.65% | -26.39% | -10.69% | -29.70% | -22.30% | 145.46% | 40.00% | -19.32% | 28.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPH and PBD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PPH and PBD has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PPH vs. PBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPH
PBD
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PPH
PBD
-
Industrials
PPH
PBD
Basic Materials
PPH
-
PBD
Communication Services
PPH
-
PBD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PPH
-
PBD
Consumer Defensive
PPH
-
PBD
Energy
PPH
-
PBD
Financial Services
PPH
-
PBD
Real Estate
PPH
-
PBD
-
Technology
PPH
-
PBD
Utilities
PPH
-
PBD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPH vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank
PPH
PBD
PPH vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPH | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.47 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 5.71 | -3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 19.24 | -14.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPH vs. PBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, smaller than the maximum PBD drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and PBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPH | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.45% | -78.60% | +27.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -12.78% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -52.45% | +34.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | -69.15% | +48.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | -75.40% | +45.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -43.63% | +38.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -53.37% | +36.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 3.78% | +0.67% |
Volatility
PPH vs. PBD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is 5.95%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that PPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPH | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 10.96% | -5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 19.02% | -6.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 24.81% | -7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 28.59% | -13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 27.35% | -10.35% |
PPH vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPH vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison
PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than PBD's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.76% | 2.71% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 2.98% | 0.67% | 0.48% | 1.83% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.04% | 1.24% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.05% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPH and PBD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBD has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to PPH (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs PBD's -78.60%.
On 10-year performance, PBD leads with 9.10% vs 8.39% for PPH. On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, PPH has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PBD has performed better with a 9.10% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.
PPH has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.76% for PBD.
PPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PBD is Alternative Energy Equities. PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.75% for PBD.
PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPH and PBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer