PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPH vs. PBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPH vs. PBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than PBD's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has underperformed PBD with an annualized return of 8.39%, while PBD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.


PPH

1D
-1.04%
1M
4.48%
YTD
2.96%
6M
3.80%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
12.38%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
8.39%

PBD

1D
0.84%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
28.03%
6M
27.73%
1Y
72.58%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
-5.27%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPH vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
2.96%22.00%8.05%6.95%2.64%17.79%5.49%19.39%-5.89%15.23%
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
28.03%43.65%-26.39%-10.69%-29.70%-22.30%145.46%40.00%-19.32%28.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PPH and PBD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between PPH and PBD has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PPH vs. PBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPH
PBD

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Industrials

0.1%
44.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.9%

Energy

-

12.2%

Financial Services

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

7.3%

Utilities

-

11.7%

Healthcare

PPH
100.0%
PBD

-

Industrials

PPH
0.1%
PBD
44.4%

Basic Materials

PPH

-

PBD
3.2%

Communication Services

PPH

-

PBD

-

Consumer Cyclical

PPH

-

PBD
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

PPH

-

PBD
0.9%

Energy

PPH

-

PBD
12.2%

Financial Services

PPH

-

PBD
1.1%

Real Estate

PPH

-

PBD

-

Technology

PPH

-

PBD
7.3%

Utilities

PPH

-

PBD
11.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPH vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PBD
PBD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPH vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPHPBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.47

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

5.71

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

19.24

-14.94

PPH vs. PBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the PBD Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPH and PBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPH vs. PBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, smaller than the maximum PBD drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and PBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPHPBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.45%

-78.60%

+27.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-12.78%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-52.45%

+34.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.26%

-69.15%

+48.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.70%

-75.40%

+45.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-43.63%

+38.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-53.37%

+36.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

3.78%

+0.67%

Volatility

PPH vs. PBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is 5.95%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that PPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPHPBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

10.96%

-5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

19.02%

-6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

24.81%

-7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

28.59%

-13.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

27.35%

-10.35%

PPH vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPH vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than PBD's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
1.76%2.71%1.81%2.85%2.98%0.67%0.48%1.83%1.86%1.76%2.04%1.24%
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
2.05%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPH and PBD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBD has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to PPH (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs PBD's -78.60%.

On 10-year performance, PBD leads with 9.10% vs 8.39% for PPH. On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, PPH has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PBD has performed better with a 9.10% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.

PPH has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.76% for PBD.

PPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PBD is Alternative Energy Equities. PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.75% for PBD.

PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPH and PBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer