PortfoliosLab logo
PPH vs. FPHAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PPH and FPHAX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PPH vs. FPHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%450.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
269.71%
418.79%
PPH
FPHAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PPH:

-0.09

FPHAX:

-0.76

Sortino Ratio

PPH:

0.08

FPHAX:

-0.88

Omega Ratio

PPH:

1.01

FPHAX:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

PPH:

-0.02

FPHAX:

-0.52

Martin Ratio

PPH:

-0.04

FPHAX:

-1.17

Ulcer Index

PPH:

7.71%

FPHAX:

13.16%

Daily Std Dev

PPH:

15.65%

FPHAX:

21.10%

Max Drawdown

PPH:

-46.49%

FPHAX:

-37.34%

Current Drawdown

PPH:

-12.49%

FPHAX:

-26.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than FPHAX's -9.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has outperformed FPHAX with an annualized return of 3.71%, while FPHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.85% annualized return.


PPH

YTD

-0.06%

1M

6.21%

6M

-4.54%

1Y

-1.37%

5Y*

9.34%

10Y*

3.71%

FPHAX

YTD

-9.42%

1M

2.82%

6M

-16.56%

1Y

-15.89%

5Y*

0.97%

10Y*

0.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PPH vs. FPHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FPHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PPH vs. FPHAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PPH is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PPH is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PPH is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PPH is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PPH is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PPH is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FPHAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FPHAX is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FPHAX is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FPHAX is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FPHAX is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FPHAX is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FPHAX is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PPH vs. FPHAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PPH Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is higher than the FPHAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPH and FPHAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.09
-0.76
PPH
FPHAX

Dividends

PPH vs. FPHAX - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than FPHAX's 1.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
1.98%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%1.71%
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
1.47%1.21%0.63%1.33%1.17%1.31%1.31%1.44%1.33%1.07%5.59%5.81%

Drawdowns

PPH vs. FPHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -46.49%, which is greater than FPHAX's maximum drawdown of -37.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and FPHAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-12.49%
-26.55%
PPH
FPHAX

Volatility

PPH vs. FPHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is 8.31%, while Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that PPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.31%
11.17%
PPH
FPHAX