PPH vs. FTXH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) and FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PPH tracks the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index while FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PPH returned 9.67%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for FTXH. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPH charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXH.

Performance

PPH vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than FTXH's 10.44% return.

PPH

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 23.31%
• 3Y*: 12.54%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 8.52%

FTXH

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 10.44%
• 6M: 9.18%
• 1Y: 44.59%
• 3Y*: 12.98%
• 5Y*: 8.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPH vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF	2.92%	22.00%	8.05%	6.95%	2.64%	17.79%	5.49%	19.39%	-5.89%	15.23%
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF	10.44%	24.15%	2.98%	-1.41%	2.55%	6.14%	11.73%	22.13%	-9.51%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PPH and FTXH is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016	0.73

The correlation between PPH and FTXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PPH vs. FTXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PPH	FTXH
Healthcare	100.0%	100.0%
Industrials	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PPH vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH

PPH Risk / Return Rank: 40
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 36

FTXH

FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 87
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPH vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PPH	FTXH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.61	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	3.81	-1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	6.00	-3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	17.65	-12.36

PPH vs. FTXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FTXH Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPH and FTXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PPH vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than FTXH's maximum drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and FTXH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPH	FTXH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.45%	-32.11%	-19.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.76%	-7.47%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-19.51%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.26%	-19.51%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	0.00%	-4.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.29%	-5.81%	-11.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.41%	2.53%	+1.88%

Volatility

PPH vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) at 5.42%. This indicates that PPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPH	FTXH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	5.42%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.27%	12.04%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.66%	17.18%	+0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	16.37%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	18.42%	-1.44%

PPH vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PPH vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than FTXH's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF	1.16%	1.41%	1.66%	1.55%	1.11%	1.03%	0.82%	0.67%	0.91%	2.18%	0.19%	0.00%
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF	2.05%	1.78%	1.98%	2.09%	1.55%	1.62%	1.66%	1.77%	1.97%	1.92%	2.43%	1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PPH and FTXH in my portfolio?

PPH and FTXH have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PPH or FTXH?

PPH has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to FTXH (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs FTXH's -32.11%.

Which ETF is better, PPH or FTXH?

On 5-year performance, PPH leads with 9.67% vs 8.45% for FTXH. On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FTXH has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PPH or FTXH?

Over the 5-year period, PPH has performed better with a 9.67% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PPH or FTXH?

PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PPH or FTXH?

PPH has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.16% for FTXH.

What is the main difference between PPH and FTXH?

PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.60% for FTXH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.