PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
POWR vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

POWR vs. GII

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. POWR is actively managed, while GII is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWR returned 8.74%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for GII. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

POWR vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 17.55% return, which is significantly higher than GII's 9.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with POWR having a 8.74% annualized return and GII not far behind at 8.70%.

POWR

1D
-1.96%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
17.55%
6M
16.63%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
8.74%

GII

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
9.45%
6M
8.82%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWR vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		17.55%10.81%-1.30%3.66%42.54%42.03%-28.30%8.44%-11.74%9.69%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF		9.45%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between POWR and GII is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.54

The correlation between POWR and GII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

POWR vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
POWR
GII

Utilities

45.6%
25.9%

Industrials

33.0%
27.8%

Energy

11.0%
20.3%

Technology

9.5%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

POWR
45.6%
GII
25.9%

Industrials

POWR
33.0%
GII
27.8%

Energy

POWR
11.0%
GII
20.3%

Technology

POWR
9.5%
GII
2.5%

Basic Materials

POWR
1.0%
GII

-

Communication Services

POWR

-

GII
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

POWR

-

GII

-

Consumer Defensive

POWR

-

GII

-

Financial Services

POWR

-

GII
4.8%

Healthcare

POWR

-

GII

-

Real Estate

POWR

-

GII
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF

SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with POWR:
POWR vs. GRIDPOWR vs. AIPOPOWR vs. XLUPOWR vs. PAVEPOWR vs. ZAPPOWR vs. VPUPOWR vs. XLUI
Often compared with GII:
GII vs. IGFGII vs. PAVEGII vs. NFRAGII vs. IFRAGII vs. TOLZGII vs. XLUGII vs. BN

Return for Risk

POWR vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWR vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

POWRGIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.25
1.63

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.79
2.28

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.98

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

8.50

+0.12

POWR vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWR and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POWR vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than GII's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and GII.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

POWRGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-50.98%

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-5.94%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-14.31%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-20.67%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

-42.84%

-20.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-3.03%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-11.49%

-6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.08%

+0.37%

Volatility

POWR vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) at 3.57%. This indicates that POWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

POWRGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

3.57%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

8.96%

+3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

10.86%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

14.09%

+8.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

17.08%

+8.44%

POWR vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both POWR and GII have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

POWR vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than GII's 2.67% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF		2.67%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		5.48%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

POWR and GII have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWR has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to GII (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 10-year performance, POWR leads with 8.74% vs 8.70% for GII. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, POWR has performed better with a 8.74% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

POWR and GII have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 2.67% for GII.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWR and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer