POWA vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. POWA is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, POWA returned 7.06%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

POWA vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 10.93% return.

POWA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: -1.12%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.13%
• ALL TIME*: 8.65%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	$229.23K	$296.08K	$400.22K
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M

POWA vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.99%	11.71%	13.18%	10.58%	-7.67%	24.93%	8.88%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	26.20%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and TDVG is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020	0.90

The correlation between POWA and TDVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

POWA vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POWA	TDVG
Technology	23.0%	27.4%
Industrials	19.6%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	17.9%	6.6%
Healthcare	17.4%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	16.1%	6.7%
Communication Services	2.1%	0.8%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.5%
Financial Services	1.9%	19.3%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Energy	-	4.5%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

POWA vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POWA

POWA Risk / Return Rank: 18
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POWA vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POWA	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.87	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	2.69	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.34	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	2.51	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.03	10.48	-9.45

POWA vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWA and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POWA vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWA	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-19.20%	-28.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-7.24%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-14.02%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	-19.20%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-0.92%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-3.67%	-2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	1.73%	+2.51%

Volatility

POWA vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that POWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWA	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	2.20%	+1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	7.30%	+1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	9.74%	+2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.99%	13.87%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	13.81%	+2.26%

POWA vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWA vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.93%	0.94%	0.79%	1.60%	1.48%	1.06%	1.34%	1.16%	1.39%	1.63%	2.18%	3.31%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWA and TDVG in my portfolio?

POWA and TDVG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POWA or TDVG?

POWA has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, POWA or TDVG?

On 5-year performance, TDVG leads with 10.00% vs 7.06% for POWA. On fees, POWA is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POWA or TDVG?

Over the 5-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWA or TDVG?

POWA is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWA or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.93% for POWA.

What is the main difference between POWA and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.