POWA vs. GAA
POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while GAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Cambria. POWA is passively managed, while GAA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWA returned 10.26%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for GAA. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
POWA vs. GAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has outperformed GAA with an annualized return of 10.26%, while GAA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.21% annualized return.
POWA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.69%
GAA
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $221.78K | $178.12K | $220.71K | |
| $275.81K | $326.17K | $415.64K |
POWA vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 1.81% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -3.96% | 21.52% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 8.56% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | 11.17% | 9.11% | 15.12% | -7.15% | 15.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and GAA is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.55 |
The correlation between POWA and GAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
GAA
POWA vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWA | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 3.27 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 11.60 | -10.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWA vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than GAA's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and GAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -26.57% | -21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -5.78% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -7.18% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -18.47% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | -26.57% | -9.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -1.42% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -3.82% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 1.62% | +2.63% |
Volatility
POWA vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) at 1.83%. This indicates that POWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 1.83% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 7.67% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 9.42% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 11.31% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 11.09% | +4.99% |
POWA vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both POWA and GAA have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
POWA vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than GAA's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.50% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.92% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWA and GAA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWA has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to GAA (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs GAA's -26.57%.
On 10-year performance, POWA leads with 10.26% vs 7.21% for GAA. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, POWA has performed better with a 10.26% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POWA and GAA have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.92% for POWA.
POWA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GAA is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria.
GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWA and GAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer