POWA vs. AVIE

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and AVIE (Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. POWA is passively managed, while AVIE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, POWA returned 9.97%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for AVIE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVIE.

Performance

POWA vs. AVIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than AVIE's 16.94% return.

POWA

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.76%
• 6M: -3.35%
• YTD: -0.82%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

AVIE

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 1.67%
• 6M: 14.10%
• YTD: 16.94%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: 13.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWA vs. AVIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	-0.82%	11.71%	13.18%	10.58%	9.21%
AVIE Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF	16.94%	11.37%	6.17%	4.19%	15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and AVIE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2022	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between POWA and AVIE has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

POWA vs. AVIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POWA	AVIE
Technology	27.1%	0.1%
Industrials	18.7%	1.3%
Healthcare	17.7%	26.3%
Consumer Defensive	15.7%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.9%	0.0%
Financial Services	2.4%	15.0%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.1%
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	9.8%
Energy	-	30.0%
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

POWA vs. AVIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWA

POWA Risk / Return Rank: 14
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

AVIE

AVIE Risk / Return Rank: 92
AVIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AVIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AVIE Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AVIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AVIE Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWA vs. AVIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POWA	AVIE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	2.55	-2.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	3.70	-3.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.45	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	5.24	-4.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.82	16.43	-15.61

POWA vs. AVIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the AVIE Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWA and AVIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POWA vs. AVIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than AVIE's maximum drawdown of -12.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and AVIE.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWA	AVIE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-12.39%	-35.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-4.97%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-12.39%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.03%	-0.07%	-4.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-2.97%	-3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	1.60%	+2.49%

Volatility

POWA vs. AVIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is 2.81%, while Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that POWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWA	AVIE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	3.66%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	7.47%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.76%	10.21%	+1.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.93%	12.90%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.04%	12.90%	+3.14%

POWA vs. AVIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AVIE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWA vs. AVIE - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than AVIE's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVIE Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF	1.42%	1.75%	1.89%	3.72%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.95%	0.94%	0.79%	1.60%	1.48%	1.06%	1.34%	1.16%	1.39%	1.63%	2.18%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWA and AVIE in my portfolio?

POWA and AVIE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POWA or AVIE?

AVIE has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to POWA (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs AVIE's -12.39%.

Which ETF is better, POWA or AVIE?

On 3-year performance, AVIE leads with 13.54% vs 9.97% for POWA. On fees, AVIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, POWA has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POWA or AVIE?

Over the 3-year period, AVIE has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWA or AVIE?

AVIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWA or AVIE?

AVIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.95% for POWA.

What is the main difference between POWA and AVIE?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.25% for AVIE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.