POWA vs. SPXM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. POWA is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.

Performance

POWA vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

POWA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 6M: -2.55%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: 10.86%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 10.28%

SPXM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWA vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	-2.29%	3.56%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.00%	9.16%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and SPXM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

POWA vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWA

POWA Risk / Return Rank: 14
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWA vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POWA	SPXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POWA	SPXM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	1.56	-1.02

Drawdowns

POWA vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and SPXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWA	SPXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-5.08%	-42.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.44%	-0.75%	-5.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-0.79%	-5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	POWA	SPXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	8.18%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.92%	8.18%	+5.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.05%	8.18%	+7.87%

POWA vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWA vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.96%	0.94%	0.79%	1.60%	1.48%	1.06%	1.34%	1.16%	1.39%	1.63%	2.18%	3.31%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWA and SPXM in my portfolio?

POWA and SPXM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, POWA or SPXM?

On fees, POWA is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWA or SPXM?

POWA is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWA or SPXM?

POWA has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

What is the main difference between POWA and SPXM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.47% for SPXM.