POWA vs. GXLC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - POWA tracks the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

POWA vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 10.06% return.

POWA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: -1.12%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.13%
• ALL TIME*: 8.65%

GXLC

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 8.81%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	$27.98K	$20.23K	$17.31K
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	$229.23K	$296.08K	$400.22K

POWA vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.99%	1.00%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	10.06%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and GXLC is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

POWA vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POWA

POWA Risk / Return Rank: 18
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POWA vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POWA	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.03	—	—

Drawdowns

POWA vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWA	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-9.08%	-38.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-1.48%	-1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-1.58%	-4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	POWA	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	13.60%	-1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.99%	13.60%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	13.60%	+2.47%

POWA vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWA vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than GXLC's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.64%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.93%	0.94%	0.79%	1.60%	1.48%	1.06%	1.34%	1.16%	1.39%	1.63%	2.18%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWA and GXLC in my portfolio?

POWA and GXLC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, POWA or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWA or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWA or GXLC?

POWA has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.64% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between POWA and GXLC?

POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.02% for GXLC.