POW vs. UPSD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UPSD.

Performance

POW vs. UPSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 35.68% return, which is significantly higher than UPSD's 8.80% return.

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UPSD

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.74%
• 6M: 6.85%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 1Y: 18.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POW vs. UPSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF	8.80%	-1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between POW and UPSD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

POW vs. UPSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UPSD

UPSD Risk / Return Rank: 42
UPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
UPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
UPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 43
UPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
UPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POW vs. UPSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POW	UPSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.04	—

Drawdowns

POW vs. UPSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -20.28%, smaller than the maximum UPSD drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and UPSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	POW	UPSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.28%	-23.85%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.28%	0.00%	-20.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-3.76%	-0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	POW	UPSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.06%	14.27%	+18.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.06%	20.71%	+12.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.06%	20.71%	+12.35%

POW vs. UPSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UPSD's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

POW vs. UPSD - Dividend Comparison

POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than UPSD's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF	0.66%	0.67%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POW and UPSD in my portfolio?

POW and UPSD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, POW or UPSD?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, POW or UPSD?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POW or UPSD?

UPSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between POW and UPSD?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.79% for UPSD.