POW vs. RSPG
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. POW is actively managed, while RSPG is passively managed. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.
Performance
POW vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 33.15% return.
POW
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -20.54%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RSPG
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- 6M
- 19.97%
- YTD
- 33.15%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 24.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.43M | $2.30M | $3.15M | |
| $7.70M | $8.14M | $10.80M |
POW vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 22.51% | -1.70% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 33.15% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and RSPG is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPG
POW vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and RSPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -79.98% | +51.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.02% | -6.46% | -21.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -25.34% | +20.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.48% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 22.09% | +11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 27.94% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 33.46% | +0.32% |
POW vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than RSPG's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.99% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and RSPG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSPG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSPG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.16% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while RSPG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.40% for RSPG.
Find the right allocation for POW and RSPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer