POW vs. FPAG
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and FPAG (FPA Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while FPAG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by FPA. Both are actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FPAG.
Performance
POW vs. FPAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 38.73% return, which is significantly higher than FPAG's 15.75% return.
POW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- YTD
- 38.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FPAG
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.39M | $1.43M | $2.03M | |
| $1.11M | $2.15M | $2.58M |
POW vs. FPAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.73% | -1.70% |
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF | 15.75% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and FPAG is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. FPAG — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FPAG
POW vs. FPAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | FPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. FPAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FPAG drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and FPAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | FPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -28.43% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.49% | 0.00% | -18.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -6.16% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. FPAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | FPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.40% | 15.16% | +19.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 19.27% | +15.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 19.27% | +15.13% |
POW vs. FPAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FPAG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. FPAG - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FPAG's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF | 1.26% | 1.99% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 1.22% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and FPAG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FPAG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FPAG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
FPAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while FPAG is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and FPA. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.49% for FPAG.
Find the right allocation for POW and FPAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer