FPAG vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
FPAG and AOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FPAG is an actively managed fund by FPA. It was launched on Dec 16, 2021. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
FPAG vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FPAG vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF | -1.48% | 25.17% | 15.64% | 29.55% | -17.87% | 2.93% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | -0.59% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 2.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPAG achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's -0.59% return.
FPAG
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 23.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FPAG vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPAG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FPAG vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
FPAG
AOA
FPAG vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPAG | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.97 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.98 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 8.82 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPAG | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FPAG and AOA is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FPAG vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
FPAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than AOA's 2.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF | 1.54% | 1.99% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.19% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
FPAG vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPAG drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, roughly equal to the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPAG and AOA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPAG | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -28.38% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -9.62% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -5.18% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -4.08% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.16% | +1.21% |
Volatility
FPAG vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 5.28%. This indicates that FPAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FPAG | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 5.28% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 8.34% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 13.87% | +5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 12.92% | +6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 13.51% | +5.99% |